Analytical essay on "Why Read Shakespeare"

Side 1

[navn fjernet] assignment – analysis of non-fiction Køge Gymnasium

3.J 11/1 – 2012

Why do we still read Shakespeare?

Navigating in life is a complexity, which most people, at some point, find difficult. Where does one belong, what path are we supposed to follow and to where does it lead? – These are questions that we tend to ask ourselves, without knowing the answer. Literature is a way of expressing feelings and opinions and literature often reflects the world through the eyes of the writer. Shakespeare was an artist, who had the ability to create literature and acts that focuses on the complexity of navigating in life. This is one of the reasons he is one of the most interesting artists in history, and the reason why the topic “Why do we still read Shakespeare?”

appeared on Yahoo!’s website as recently as on January 7^{th}, 2009.

“Why do we still read Shakespeare?” is a non-fictive text found on one of Yahoo!’s forums. The question ‘why do we still read Shakespeare’ was raised by Lucy and answered by Dr. Mick.

These nicknames are representing people having interest in the subject, in this case Shakespeare. Since the text is found on the internet, more specific a forum (where you and I can participate), it is needed to be very critical about the content. Through a wider research, I found out that the actual response (the given text) is not from a random, anonymous user of the Yahoo!-forum, nor from any other forum, but is an extract from a speech held for study reasons. The speech was held in front of a thousand college students by Michael Mack, Director of Universe Honors Program and a professor in English [1]. This is also revealed in the sentence

                                           rd
“(…) certainly worthy subjects to study in college.” (3

stanza) The reason I’m pointing this out is that the value of the text seem different as the author changes from an internet-forum-user to the authoritarian appearance of a professor of English. This makes the source much more reliable and the value way higher, because of the fact, that we know, for sure, the professor has an education to support his statements.

Thereby there’s no doubt who the receivers would be based on the original source, but to focus on the actual given text, the receiver is not so different. The receiver would be the one seeking

to find “beauty and meaning in life” (5^{th} stanza) – and who doesn’t want that? It’s an existential

1

http://publicaffairs.cua.edu/RDSpeeches/09freshmanconvocation.cfm

Side 2

[navn fjernet] assignment – analysis of non-fiction Køge Gymnasium

3.J 11/1 – 2012

drive to aim for success, and so the audience is very broad, interesting students as well as adults. So Shakespeare isn’t just for the literary types, he is for anyone interested in navigating the real world.

The text or Dr. Mick states: “as you learn to read Shakespeare, you are learning to read the

world.” (6^{th} stanza) This quote would definitely say something about the theme of this text,

followed by: “As you interpret Shakespeare’s characters, you are practicing figuring out life’s characters.” The theme is obviously about learning about the world and its characters – including yourself. Navigating in life is no beauty by itself – It’s how you do it, and what you gain from doing it. This is leading towards Shakespeare, as the attitude of this text sees Shakespeare as a mentor of life. The quotations from previous statement are great examples of the positive view upon the literature of Shakespeare. The literature of Shakespeare can be used as a tool to navigate in life: “Struggling with the complexities involved in interpreting Shakespeare is a

                                                     th
superb preparation for struggling with the complexities of life.” (6 stanza) Very directly

speaking, there is in this line created a direct link between Shakespeare and life. Comparing Shakespeare with such a great thing as life does show the subjective influence of this non-fictive text, but the thing is that it carries a message. It strongly encourages the reader to start reading Shakespeare. It invites, because of the fact (according to the text), that reading Shakespeare will give you the ability to find beauty and meaning in life.

The text is presenting these statements as facts, which are not for debate, and to support the message of the text, a lot of argumentation is used. First of all, the text is influenced by direct use of arguing. This is very obvious since the author directly presents the advantages of reading Shakespeare.

Logically, the author draws a line between the literature at the time of Shakespeare and the

                                                                       rd
literature of today. “In Shakespeare’s time, great books were thought of as mirrors.” (3

stanza) Using history as argumentation always has a strong effect on the reader. Furthermore,

bringing up a subject that the reader can relate to (reading a book that reflects ourselves/the

world) tends to win the reader’s attention and to gain the reader’s understanding.

The text uses a lot of Ethos to persuade the reader about the message. Mostly, though very

Side 3

[navn fjernet] assignment – analysis of non-fiction Køge Gymnasium

3.J 11/1 – 2012

indirectly, the text are influenced by the use of commissives. “As you learn to read

Shakespeare, you are learning to read the world.” (6^{th} stanza) hidden between the lines is the

message, that you will be guaranteed more success in life by understanding Shakespeare. This tone is held throughout the whole text, and it’s very likely to tease the reader for further reading because, I repeat; who doesn’t want that?

The text has a very sharp language, which is a formal must for the overall impression of the reader. The lix is high, and there’s only positive words describing Shakespeare and literature in general. Too, a strong language will make the reader more likely to agree with the writers statements.

The text is written as based on facts. This is a crucial rhetorical instrument that works as a very

                                                     th
convincing argument. “This two-way mirroring means that (…)” (5

stanza). “Means” works as a truth-defining word, a fact, leaving the reader with no other option than believing in it.

“Means” is only one of many verbs used in this text to give the exact same effect – the reliable feeling of facts. A discussion could be raised whether these really are facts or just a subjective conviction. I would dare to say this is a matter of personal opinion, but this may be because I doubt the message of this text.

If you were in doubt about the question “to read Shakespeare or not to read Shakespeare”, you would certainly know the answer after reading this text – whether your interests lies in the pages of literature or not. The writer has successfully put together a text that convinces any individual about the importance of the pieces and literature of Mr. Shakespeare. The link between understanding Shakespeare and understanding life is exposed through the use of rhetorical argumentation. The writer wanted to enlighten the reader about the positive sites of Shakespeare’s work, and I think he did just that.

So, why do we read Shakespeare in modern days like these? – because the literature of Shakespeare is timeless and deals with an issue, that touches all of humanity.